In the interest of fairness
In the interest of fairness, the Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) owe the menbers of TAC more information than is being disseminated.
Nowhere on the TAC website will one find any unbiased information on the alternatives to relocation to Takenawa. This is surely the design of the LRPC,its Chairman and their paid propaganda consultants Gavin Anderson.
One fact is abundantly clear: the LRPC has not presented alternatives for the simple reason that they don't wish the membership to think there are any.
So Gerald, 'fess up, what are ALL the alternatives and why haven't you presented them? In your profession I'm sure you understand the legal implications of non-disclosure or don't they teach that at Keio?
Enquiring minds wish to know! Over to you...
5 Comments:
The LRPC works at the pleasure of the BOG. So let's put the ultimate responsibility for this to the Members where it belongs - at the BOG. So what do they have to say? What have they done to review and determine that the recommendations of the LRPC are approriate and without bias?
Rather than what they have to say, what do they have to gain? ...follow the money...
Sincerely,
Paul Marques
The BOG approved a payroll for 2006 of Y2.2bn.($19 million) which is 70% of operating revenue. What more has to be said about fiscal (ir)responsibility and maximizing value for the members. There is a major disconnect here. Keep your seat belts fastened for you are in for a very rough ride if the rebuilding goes ahead.
Seems like a cat has got Gerry's tongue? I know he reads this.
www.dilbert.com
Post a Comment
<< Home